The Benefits Accuracy Measurement (BAM) program provides reliable estimates of the accuracy of benefit payments and denied claims in the UI program, and identifies the sources of mispayments and improper denials so that their causes can be eliminated.
The current total hour burden for both paid and denied claims and the 52 SWAs is:
52 SWAs X 3,445.1 responses = 179,145.2 responses averaged among 52 respondents
52 SWAs X 9,154.1 hours = 476,013.2 hours
This contrasts with the 2009 estimated burden for both paid and denied claims and the 52 SWAs which was:
52 SWAs X 3,634.3 responses = 188,983.6 responses averaged among 52 respondents
52 SWAs X 8,267.25 hours = 429,897 hours
The change reflects increased emphasis placed on gathering, verifying, and reporting payment accuracy information as mandated by law and regulation. Seventeen states provided information and feedback which was used in the revised burden estimates. The slightly downward change in the number of participants is based on calendar year 2011 data.
The Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act (IPERA) of 2010 (signed into law on July 22, 2010) require agencies to examine the risk of erroneous payments in all programs and activities they administer. IPERA defines "significant erroneous payments" as annual erroneous payments exceeding both 2.5 percent of program payments and $10 million. The UI program meets both of these criteria. Additionally, IPERA codifies the requirement for valid statistical estimates of improper payments such as those generated by BAM and compels actions to reduce improper payments. Furthermore, the "Revised Parts I and II to Appendix C of OMB Circular A-123" (issued April 14, 2011) requires additional efforts on the part of the states to obtain complete and accurate information used for estimation purposes. SWAs make all UI payment decisions. Therefore, the Department of Labor (DOL) is requiring SWAs to review their BAM improper payment data and report their planned activities to prevent, detect, reduce, and recover improper payments in an UI Integrity Action Plan.
In addition, ROCIS entries were adjusted by the addition of two ICs reflecting third party burden which should have been reflected in the previously approved submission. Thus, the totals appear larger overall even though the other two ICs appeared in the previously approved submission in 2009 (but did not show up in ROCIS, inadvertently, to reflect the third party burden attributed to this ICR).
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.