OMB.report

Federal forms, ICRs, and supporting documents

Information Collection Request

4,4' - Methylenedianiline in Construction (29 CFR 1926.60)

ICR 201607-1218-005 · OMB 1218-0183 · Historical Inactive

Forms and Documents
DocumentTypeStatusAvailability
SS_1218-0183 MDA in Construction 09-10-16.docx Supporting Statement A Uploaded 2016-08-11 Available
eCFR-1926.60 (1).docx Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-29 Available
29 CFR 1926.33 eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations (010816).pdf Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-18 Available
29 cfr 1913.10eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations.pdf Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-18 Available
29 cfr 1910.134 eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations.pdf Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-18 Available
29 cfr 1910.1020 eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations.pdf Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-18 Repair queued
29 cfr 1910.1200 eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations.pdf Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-18 Available
Section 8 U.S.C 657.doc Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-17 Repair queued
Section 6 U.S.C 655.doc Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-17 Available
Section 2 U.S.C. 651.doc Supplementary Document Uploaded 2016-02-17 Available
IC Document Collections
IC IDCollectionTypeStatusForm
14128 4,4'-Methylenedianiline in Construction (29 CFR 1926.60) Unchanged
ICR Details
1218-0183 201607-1218-005
Historical Inactive 201602-1218-003
DOL/OSHA 1218-0183(2016)SIP-IV
4,4' - Methylenedianiline in Construction (29 CFR 1926.60)
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Comment filed on proposed rule and continue 11/22/2016
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/04/2016
OMB is withholding approval at this time. Prior to publication of the final rule, the agency should provide a summary of any comments related to the information collection and their response, including any changes made to the ICR as a result of comments. In addition, the agency must enter the correct burden estimates.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
06/30/2019 36 Months From Approved 07/31/2019
2,469 0 2,469
986 0 986
74,466 0 74,466
The purpose of this Standard and its information collection requirements is to provide protection for workers from adverse health effects associated with occupational exposure to MDA in the construction industry. Employers must monitor exposure, ensure worker exposures are within the permissible exposure limits, provide workers with medical examinations and training, and establish and maintain worker exposure-monitoring and medical records. OSHA is proposing to remove the requirement that employers document employee’s social security number (SSN) in their exposure and medical records. Time to document SSN in records is negligible and therefore, the Agency is not requesting changes to the burden hour or cost estimates in this ICR.
US Code: 29 USC 651 Name of Law: Occupational Safety and Health Act
   US Code: 29 USC 655 Name of Law: Occupational Safety and Health Act
   US Code: 29 USC 657 Name of Law: Occupational Safety and Health Act
  
None
1218-AC67 Proposed rulemaking 81 FR 68504 10/04/2016
  81 FR 68504 10/04/2016
81 FR 68504 10/04/2016
No
1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
4,4'-Methylenedianiline in Construction (29 CFR 1926.60)
No
No
$0
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Belinda Cannon 202 693-2083 [email protected]
  No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/04/2016