we received a letter dated 1/29/86 from NIRMA asserting that the reporting requirements in this proposed rule would result in "an annua cost to a utility in excess of $313,000 per nuclear power unit." Within the next 145 days, please explain how you plan to resolve the concerns expressed in that letter. Specifically, please explain--in practical, operational terms, for what purpose the reporting burden is needed to be imposed in order to accomplish the proper performance the functions of this program--for each reporting or recordkeeping requirement included in the proposed rule. Also, please reassess the burden estimate in light of these concerns.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
10/31/1988
10/31/1988
01/31/1986
19,200
0
19,200
115,210
0
115,210
0
0
0
NUCLEAR RADIATION MONITORING, RADIATION SAFETY, PACKAGE, THEFT, LOSS, NUCLEAR MATERIAL' THE NRC IS PROPOSING A MAJOR REVISION OF 10 CFR 20 WHICH PROVIDES THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE EXPOSED, BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE WORKPLACE, THE IONIZING RADIATION FROM ROUTINE ACTIVITIES WHICH ARE LICENSED BY THE NRC.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.